Historical testing

Measured beyond profit.

Our commercial portfolio evidence uses BlackBull data, EUR 10,000 starting balance, 1:100 leverage and the STANDARD 1.00× risk profile unless a report explicitly states otherwise. Annual tests reset the balance each year; continuous tests compound over the full period.

Download the full Historical Testing & Validation Report (PDF) →
1 Jan to 26 Aug 2026 · MT5 portfolio tester · 99–100% real ticks

Cross-broker robustness

1 Jan → 26 Aug 2026

The same commercial Focused and Core portfolios were tested over the identical period on four MT5 broker environments. BlackBull remains the frozen publication reference; the other broker runs are shown to demonstrate how native market data, spreads, contract specifications and execution conditions can change the absolute result while preserving the broader strategy edge.

Axis 7even Focused4 markets · STANDARD 1.00×
BlackBullREFERENCE
+364.91%EUR 36,490.72 net profit
17.18%equity DD
1.73PF
134trades
100% real ticks
Pepperstone
+438.43%EUR 43,843.32 net profit
20.45%equity DD
1.92PF
132trades
99% real ticks
IC Markets
+389.21%EUR 38,920.76 net profit
18.96%equity DD
1.82PF
137trades
99% real ticks
FxPro
+380.45%EUR 38,045.31 net profit
19.16%equity DD
1.80PF
135trades
99% real ticks
Axis 7even Core7 markets · STANDARD 1.00×
BlackBullREFERENCE
+640.06%EUR 64,005.91 net profit
17.83%equity DD
1.72PF
200trades
100% real ticks
Pepperstone
+551.09%EUR 55,108.59 net profit
23.48%equity DD
1.82PF
205trades
100% real ticks
IC Markets
+559.89%EUR 55,988.63 net profit
19.40%equity DD
1.78PF
204trades
99% real ticks
FxPro
+583.10%EUR 58,309.79 net profit
19.35%equity DD
1.74PF
208trades
99% real ticks

All eight same-period runs use EUR 10,000 starting balance, 1:100 leverage and STANDARD risk. The cross-broker result range is itself part of the robustness evidence: exact trades and profits are not expected to be identical when broker H1 candles, spreads, symbol specifications, margin rules and fills differ.

1 Jan 2024 to 26 Aug 2026 · continuous compounding

BlackBull vs Pepperstone

High-quality long-window data

Axis 7even isn't built to win fast — it's built to stay profitable long enough for compounding to do the work. Below, the same 2024–26 Aug 2026 window is shown two ways: first as three separate years, each restarting from €10,000, then as one continuous run where nothing resets and each year's gains become the next year's starting capital.

Step 1 · three separate annual years (each resets to €10,000)
Axis 7even Focused
2024
Focused +287.79%
resets to €10,000 · BlackBull
2025
Focused +235.53%
resets to €10,000 · BlackBull
2026 to 26 Aug · 4 brokers
Focused +364.91%
Pepperstone +438.43% · IC Markets +389.21% · FxPro +380.45%
resets to €10,000 · BlackBull shown as headline, others real too
Axis 7even Core
2024
Core +350.62%
resets to €10,000 · BlackBull
2025
Core +170.25%
resets to €10,000 · BlackBull
2026 to 26 Aug · 4 brokers
Core +640.06%
Pepperstone +551.09% · IC Markets +559.89% · FxPro +583.10%
resets to €10,000 · BlackBull shown as headline, others real too

Neither product had a losing year in this window. That consistency — not any single year, and not any single broker — is what the continuous result below depends on.

Step 2 · the same years, left to compound instead of resetting
Axis 7even FocusedBlackBull
€10,000→€750,659
+7,406.59% over the window · not an annual rate
21.55% equity DD1.80 PF553 trades
100% real ticks
Axis 7even FocusedPepperstone
€10,000→€712,762
+7,027.62% over the window · not an annual rate
19.80% equity DD1.83 PF575 trades
99% real ticks
Axis 7even CoreBlackBull
€10,000→€1,116,081
+11,060.81% over the window · not an annual rate
23.47% equity DD1.80 PF819 trades
100% real ticks
Axis 7even CorePepperstone
€10,000→€856,472
+8,464.72% over the window · not an annual rate
20.46% equity DD1.69 PF845 trades
99% real ticks
Why only two brokers here?

IC Markets EU is excluded from the 2024–2026 continuous comparison because the tested server does not provide the required older H1 history. FxPro is excluded because its long-window report has only 24% real-tick history quality. Neither limitation affects the four-broker 1 Jan–26 Aug 2026 comparison above.

Axis 7even Specialist · same two-step story
2024
+443.78%
resets to €10,000
2025
+319.43%
resets to €10,000
2026 to 26 Aug
+940.43%
resets to €10,000
→
Axis 7even Specialist · BlackBull MT5 publication reference · continuous, no reset
€10,000→€1,744,255 over 1 Jan 2024 to 26 Aug 2026 (≈2.7 years), same three years shown above, left to compound
24.43% equity DD 1.67 PF 1,916 trades
Total return over the window: +17,342.55% (not an annual rate) — the balance figures above are the primary evidence; this is included for completeness.
This is compounding evidence, not a forecast

These are historical results from a specific ≈2.7-year window, not an annualized rate and not a projection of future performance. Because position sizing is percentage-based, the trade size compounds along with the balance — the same discipline that produced three profitable years in a row is what this result depends on, not a single outsized trade. Historical results do not guarantee future returns.

Axis 7even Specialist · USTEC broker portability

Same Nasdaq structure. Broker-specific trigger detail.

Signals & trades · no cross-broker profit claim

BlackBull remains the frozen publication reference for the multi-year Specialist evidence. Separate FxPro testing and independent NQ futures data were used to answer a narrower technical question: can the USTEC engine operate on another broker when the Nasdaq instrument satisfies the required contract, lot, stop, margin and time specifications? The evidence supports conditional compatibility, not identical trades on every feed.

BLACKBULL ↔ FXPRO23

exact same-time, same-direction USTEC entries in the comparable Aug–Sep sample

NEAR-TIME SIGNAL OVERLAP25

USTEC entries matched within five minutes across the two broker feeds

BROKER-ONLY ZONE OVERLAP88.5%

median same-side frozen-zone overlap in the focused 20–26 Aug diagnostics

INDEPENDENT NQ0.9996

5-minute return correlation with BlackBull USTEC.f in the independent market-data overlap

How entries were compared

Every USTEC entry from each broker was matched against the other broker's feed by timestamp and direction over the same test window. The exact-match and five-minute-overlap figures above summarize that comparison; a focused diagnostic period was examined separately to confirm the same pattern held under closer scrutiny.

Why the occasional broker-only entry occurs

Where an entry appeared on only one feed, the other broker's price action was checked directly at that moment. In every case, a strongly overlapping same-side setup was present on both feeds — it just crossed the decision threshold on one and not the other. That points to ordinary feed-timing differences (spread, tick timing, candle confirmation), not a different underlying market.

Independent NQ arbitration

BlackBull USTEC.f and independent NQ futures returns correlated 0.9965 at 30 seconds, 0.9970 at 1 minute and 0.9996 at 5 minutes — confirming both feeds track the same underlying market extremely closely. That independent data was also used as a neutral check on the broker-only entries, and it did not consistently favor one broker's feed over the other's.

Compatibility gate

A Nasdaq symbol must pass the specification — the name alone is not enough.

≤ 0.01 lotminimum volume
≤ 0.01 lotvolume step
≤ 20.0 ptsnormalized minimum stop distance
USDprofit currency
Market + SL/TPrequired order capability
Valid contract datatick size/value, contract size & margin
Full tradinginstrument permission
NY-time mapping09:30–16:30 entry · 17:00 exit

A broker requiring a larger minimum volume is not treated as "close enough." In the EUR 10,000 BlackBull/FxPro USTEC sample, the smallest actual volume on both brokers was 0.05 lot; 6 of 37 BlackBull trades and 4 of 51 FxPro trades were below 0.10 lot. Axis therefore rejects an incompatible USTEC contract rather than rounding an intended small percentage-risk trade upward. Smaller accounts make fine volume granularity even more important. Automatic resolution recognizes common Nasdaq families and then validates the selected contract; manual override remains available for advanced cases.

Historical backtests are not guarantees of future performance. Results can differ because of spreads, slippage, execution, broker specifications, data quality, leverage and changing market conditions.

Axis 7even

Back to the portfolio overview.

Compare editions, review the architecture and download documentation.